Most visitors to Zinkwazi remark on its unique ‘Village Atmosphere’ …Surprising since it lies amidst a fast developing strip of coastal resorts. Those in the know are aware that the ZBRRA association ardently uphold and protect the wishes of investors. An outline of their ideals was made known to us after an objective and comprehensive survey was carried out in 2004. This portrayed a society who were intent on protecting its tranquil ’sense of place’ Read on…….
WB
ZBRRA
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT of the ZINKWAZI TOWN-PLANING SCHEME
as proposed by the Zinkwazi Ratepayers and Residents Association
15.5.2007
SURVEY RESULTS
The overriding response to the survey was to ensure that the peaceful village character and tranquil holiday environment of Zinkwazi was of paramount importance and there was no place for a Ballito style development. All future development should be eco-friendly and fit in with the ’sense of place’ of Zinkwazi.
Provided that the unique character of the place was not compromised, controlled low impact commercialization in the form of eco-tourism, service provision and recreational facilities was acceptable under the following conditions. Their purpose is only to satisfy the needs of ratepayers, residents as well as local bonafide holidaymakers and guests. Any business attracting casual day visitors from outside the area to the detriment of the village would not be acceptable.
ZBRRA COMMITTEE PROPOSALS
The committee has evaluated and researched the survey results at length and has come up with the following proposals to address the concerns and objectives of the community.
1. Town planning regulations must be strictly enforced, particularly with regard to coverage and height of structures. It is imperative that planning approval must take into consideration the obstruction of views. With this in mind we would require that no dwelling be allowed to rise more than two storeys above street level, although we understand that this has been relaxed to three storeys in the Ballito area.
2. Rezoning of special residential properties should only be allowable in exceptional cases with the approval of the community. No development generating high traffic volumes should be allowed. Prime special residential properties are under great pressure to be ‘developed’ due to high rates costs and/or profit opportunities. This needs to be addressed to prevent undesirable types of development. Current controls allow an additional ‘granny flat’ on special residential. Special residential development pressure could possibly be controled by allowing a single dwelling for say every 600 m2 of property as long as current coverage and FAR controls are not exceeded. This would enable for example an 1800 m2 beachfront property to erect 3 dwellings without increasing the existing coverage controls.
3. All Zinkwazi applictions for rezoning or relaxation of TPS controls put before Kwa Dukuza Planning should be referred to the ZBRRA Planning Sub-Committee for comment. We could also be of assistance in referring to them variances from town planning requirements as regards FAR, distance from boundaries and dwelling and roof heights.
4. Bigger commercial establishments(such as hotels, lodges, guesthouses, restaurants, Arts & Crafts & Home Industries) should not be run on residential properties nor within special residential areas. Further approvals or rezonings in this regard should only be considered where commercial or cluster housing rights already exist. Small B & B’s up to 4 rooms, run from private homes and low impact SOHO are however acceptable within residential areas.
5. Public beach access points should be strictly controlled to prevent undesirable behaviour, vandalism, crime and public disturbance within the residential areas. Access to recreational facilities should ideally be on a pay for use basis preferably privately controlled.
6. The PUBLIC CAR PARK off Seagull Road should be developed as a pure access and parking area without picnic or other facilities. An extension to the car park is essential particularly since the storm damage. Vacant land, which is available in Seagull drive, should be acquired for this purpose. This would also obviate the need to restore the existing car park to its original size in an eco-sensitive zone. The remaining car park just needs to be stabilized and protected. Access should be controled on a 24 hour basis. During the night parking should be restricted to the new ‘off-beach’ parking area to minimise public nuisance problems. The facilities at Mahogany Reef should remain under private control. The container in the car park is an undesirable health hazard and is in conflict with the principle of avoiding attractions in public places unless under Mahogany Reef control and should possibly be removed to a commercial zone.
7. BLACK ROCK PARK currently is a public disturbance nightmare. It also should be controled on a 24 hour basis. It is inadequately serviced for sanitation and day visitors have a problem in this regard. This is unacceptable. Leasing out the park to private enterprise could perpetuate the problem of public disturbance within a residential area unless a solution is found. The lessee could provide suitable facilities for day trippers with constraints on maintenance, noise levels and hours of business.
8. Lots 224, 225, 226 and 227 in the area between Nkwazi and Magai Drives, are either Municipal property or are zoned for commercial use. In order to protect residential areas from commercial disturbance they should be encouraged to be rezoned residential, with permission for intermediate density to compensate for the loss of commercial rights. Parking facilities would have to be provided for access to the beach from Sandy Cove.
9. Lot 243, which is zoned for a church, and the municipal building on lot 39 LA should be rezoned residential and the shops moved to the new commercial area.
10. With the rezoning of Lots 224, 225, 226 and 227 the commercial hub of Zinkwazi should be moved to the entrance of the village, probably in the area presently occupied by the stables or further. This would require a developer to acquire land for commercial development. All convenience services and commercial infrastructure should be concentrated on the perimeter and/or access node to the village or in Darnall.
11. Our public open space including parks and admiralty reserve should be maintained as green belts. Indigenous bush should be preserved and protected. Expert advice should be sought how best the parks can serve the community. Facilities in our public spaces should be developed but not to the detriment of the surrounding areas. Private functions should not be allowed where they are surrounded by residential areas. Flamingo park on Lot 247, where the developers of the Ocean Reef property have dumped rubble, should be cleared and maintained as a public park. Discussions should be held with Ocean Reef regarding the funding of this enterprise. The same applies to the damage at Oyster Park.
12. Surface and underground water collection points should be encouraged on each property.
13. Policing of Noise pollution needs to be done.
14. Environmental and health considerations require that the village cannot operate for ever on a septic tank system. Consideration should be given to slurry tanks as a planning approval requirement. However this would also increase heavy vehicle traffic and could be a source of noise disturbance.

Below find links to the independent survey carried out and a map of the village
WB
